패밀리 사이트 열기/닫기 추가

[강남(수)10:30-1:00] News시사영어토론(정치/문화/교육/경제)  

# Ideal
Study Members: a person of words / who likes to learn new things / sociable
/understanding / considerate / passionate / personable

# Current
members: Those who studied/will study abroad / Students / Teachers / Advanced Learners

# Study
Timetable (첨부파일파일출력/예습권장/영어사전지참) (자료제공)

Session

[1] Article One - read together and Discuss about it on your own opinion

[2] Article Two - read together and Discuss about it on your own opinion

[3] Article Three - read together and Discuss about it on your own opinion

[1교시] Economist
Article 1

[2교시] Economist
Article 2

[3교시] Debate
Pros and Cons

#
Application Form for the STUDY /

==============================================

#이멜제목: [강남(수)10:30-1:00] News시사영어토론(정치/문화/교육/경제)

#
Application Form for the STUDY

1. English
Name.................................[ ***** ]

2. Korean
Name.................................[ ****** ]

3.
Email...............................................[ ******* ]

4. Cell
Phone .....................................[ ****************** ]

5. Brief
Introduction of Yourself [More than 5 lines ******************]

6.
CBT/iBT/TOEIC/TEPS/Speaking TEST Score [******************]

# If you
are fully ready to join the study and a sincere person to study really hard,
you are cordially invited to our Study.

Email to
via application form: vanhur@daum.net

Great minds
think alike ^^

Sincerely

 http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21660124-wind-and-solar-energy-are-increasingly-competitive-lot-has-change-they-can-make?frsc=dg%7Cd

The
Economist

Renewable
energy

Puffs
of hope 한줄기 희망

Wind
and solar energy are increasingly competitive. But a lot has to change before
they can make a real impact

Aug 1st 2015 | From the print edition

[1] ON THE afternoon of July 25th renewable generators fulfilled about
78% of Germany’s domestic demand. Such a remarkable figure, combined with news of booming wind
industries in America (see article) and China (article), might lead you to
think that the renewables revolution
is more or less victorious, with the
world moving forward into the broad, sunlit—and windy—uplands 고지대 of copious clean/청정 energy. Alas, this is not the case. 현실은 다르다

[2] In some places wind turbines and
solar cells are now a cheaper way of generating electricity than fossil fuels
are. And in a lot of others subsidies and regulatory requirements encourage
their use regardless. But despite
this progress, bought at great expense, renewables other than hydropower still
provide less than 3% of the world’s energy. The impressive growth of wind power
lags behind the rate that the
International Energy Agency (IEA), a Paris-based intergovernmental
think-tank, suggests is necessary for the world to have a good chance of
limiting global warming to less than 2°C. That two-degree scenario requires the
world to generate 11 times more wind power by 2050, and 36 times more solar
power. And it requires a big helping of new nuclear power, too. If, like German
Greens and many others, you would rather do without that helping hand, the requirement for further renewables becomes yet
more far-fetched. 설득력없는

[3] The
most equitable공정 and straightforward way to move towards
more low-carbon energy would be a global system of steadily escalating carbon
taxes. In the absence of such an
enlightened policy, 진보한정책 though, there are other ways to encourage the spread of
renewables.

[4] Removing subsidies around the world on
fossil fuels is one of them. Another is increasing public investment in
low-carbon energy research. Research
into renewable energy, storage systems and energy transmission accounts for
only about 1% of government R&D spending in rich countries. This has meant
that the renewables boom of the past decade, especially in the case of wind,
has been mostly a
come-as-you-are affair: big subsidies for the deployment of today’s
technology but very little spent on tomorrow’s.

[5] The design of electricity markets
matters, too. The best way to finance renewable energy is by creating predictable demand, which attracts institutional
investors대규모자금운용사. That usually means
long-term fixed-price contracts, allocated by auction. These schemes are
working well, particularly in emerging markets, where all extra power is
welcome. In mature ones renewables need to displace existing capacity, which is
trickier.

[6] There are further problems to
overcome. Germany’s record-breaking afternoon was a windy one in the north of
the country, where most of the turbines are, and a sunny one in the
solar-cell-covered south. Such happy coincidences have obverses 정반대상황—dark, windless winter evenings—that need to be planned for. This
requires a balance of storage capacity, backup power and interconnections
between electric grids.

[7] In places like Scandinavia and Brazil
hydroelectric 수력 and wind power work well together.
Gas-fired power stations, cheap to build and comparatively low in their
emissions, are also good. But it is hard to get people to build gas-fired power
stations that will not be used very much—which in markets with a lot of
renewables is their inevitable fate. In Germany the renewables boom has
paradoxically seen gas edged out by 몰아낸 cheaper but
much dirtier lignite. 갈탄

[8] Provision for backup capacity has to
be part of any policy that gives renewables a large role. So do technology and
pricing regimes that make it easy for people and industry to use less power
when the grid is running on fossil fuels and more when the wind is up and the
sun shining. And those grids themselves need attention; renewables benefit from
big grids that can bring electricity from distant sunny and windy places.

[9] A policy of expanding and
interconnecting grids typically works
against the interests of some producers, by eroding the ability of incumbents to extract rents. 힘들게 얻어내다 It also gives politicians less scope to interfere with their
national and local energy systems. But
it is vital if renewables are to flourish.