해커스인강, 해커스텝스, 해커스텝스인강, 텝스인강, 텝스강의, 텝스인강환급

텝스문제 Q&A글쓰기목록보기인기글보기

해석 질문입니다.
궁금 | 2008.03.18 | 조회 2576

NYTIME 의 Opinion 에 있는 글입니다.


Science at Risk (Published: March 17, 2008)


Nobody was greatly surprised last week when Stephen Johnson, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, proposed new limits on smog-forming pollutants that were weaker than those his scientists had recommended — and more to the liking of industry.


...(중략)...


Mr. Johnson hailed his standard as the “most health-protective” in the nation’s history. Technically, he was right. But if his proposed changes in the Clean Air Act ever became reality he could well be the last administrator to be able to make that claim.


마지막 문장이 잘 해석안됩니다. 직역하면 말이 안되는거 같고... 고수님들 해석 부탁드립니다.


 

해커스영어 이미지
목록보기

선생님을 선택해주세요