해커스인강, 해커스텝스, 해커스텝스인강, 텝스인강, 텝스강의, 텝스인강환급

텝스문제 Q&A글쓰기목록보기인기글보기

리딩 질문입니다.
ㅇㅇ | 2018.02.12 | 조회 601
첫번째 질문 입니다.

When people refer to a certain country as third world, they assume everyone knows what they are talking about. However, most people become quite unclear when asked to define second world or first world. Some people assume first world means the most developed countries and second world would be one step down,but this is total nonsense. One must keep in mind that these terms are outdated remnants of the cold war and have no official definition. For example, second world refers to former communist socialist,industrial states such as russia,eastern europe,some turk states and china.



What is the passage about?

에 답은

People's misconception about certain terminology 인데요. 제가 선택한 답은

The inappropriateness of certain terminology 였습니다.

본문에서도 have no official definition이라고 언급되어 있어서 아예 컨셉 자체가 이제 존재하지 않는 용어라 현대에 와서 사용하는 것이 부적절하다 라고 생각했는데 아닌가요? ㅠ



마지막 질문 입니다.



Every year,malaria causes at least two million deaths worldwide. Despite years of research,there is still no vaccine effective against the single-cell,mosquito-borne parasite that causes it. Recently, a synthetic version of a malaria toxin has proved effective in mice,according ro a study published in natue and disease in may. The researchers hope their project will yield an effective human vaccine,which will help block even the most severe and often fatal symptoms of malaria,including fluid in the lungs and cerebral malaria.



What is the best title for the passage?

답은 a new cure for malaria

이고 제가 선택한 답은 fight against malaria 였습니다.

실제로 백신이 인간에게 적용 될 수 있게 개발 된 것이 아니고 그 과정 중에 있는 것이기 때문에 cure라고 볼 수 없다고 생각해서

아래의 답이 더 적절하다고 생각했습니다 ㅠ

명쾌한 답변 부탁드립니다 ㅠㅠ
해커스영어 이미지
목록보기

선생님을 선택해주세요